By Mark Kinver Environment
reporter, BBC News
The growing evidence linking green
spaces to human wellbeing could help strengthen the case for conservation, a
conference has been told.
Professor
Ken Norris from Reading University said green spaces improved wellbeing, so
that meant "they can also be linked to our health".
Ecologists
need to do better when it comes to convincing people about the importance of
conservation, he added.
He
made his comments at the British Ecological Society's annual meeting.
Prof
Norris, a co-author of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment, said it was
sometimes necessary for scientists to closely scrutinise their own work.
"It
is very rare that we ask ourselves some very hard questions in the first place,
such as 'why the hell are we doing this in the first place?'," he told the
audience.
Making the link
He
argued that there was a need to strengthen the arguments used by ecologists to
justify the importance of the work they did.
He
explained that he favoured a framework that embraced the "ecosystem
services" concept, which places a value on ecosystem functions - such as
reducing pollution or cleaning water - based on what the economic cost would be
if we degraded an area's biodiversity.
"We
know that these things are linked to our wellbeing, so that means that they can
also be linked to our health," Prof Norris observed.
Another
speaker, Dave Stone from Natural England, highlighted that connections between
the environment and human health were appearing in a number of high level
policy documents, such as the Natural Environment White Paper.
But
he asked whether, at a population level rather than an individual level,
functional ecosystems and biodiversity were important for health.
Focusing
on urban environments, as more than 50% of humans on the planet now lived in
towns or cities, he said two key issues were air quality and excess heat.
"Most
people are well aware that both air quality and excess heat have implications
for public health," Dr Stone said.
Listing
official figures, he said that 20,000 deaths in the EU were attributed to
ground level ozone pollution, and excess heat during France's 2003 drought
claimed 15,000 lives.
He
asked: "Those effects are very real and costs thousands of lives, so what
is the role of potential ecosystem services?"
Just
looking at what he called "intra-urban" ecosystem services, he said
it was known that city trees and shrubs reduced particulate concentrations and
"vegetated urban areas experienced lowers temperatures".
Incomplete picture
The
co-ordinator of the presentations at the three-day BES meeting in Birmingham,
Dr Becca Lovell from the European Centre for Environment and Human Health
(ECEHH), said there were a number of reasons for bringing together an array of
speakers on the issue.
"There
is a lot of research that is linked to green spaces in general and people's
health," she told BBC News.
"But
what we don't know what type of green space this is; whether it is a golf
course, forest or coastal area etc.
"We
also don't know about the state of that green space; whether it is degraded or
whether it is very high quality with a lot of biodiversity, and whether that is
important for people's health and wellbeing."
While
there were some examples of GPs prescribing walks etc, Dr Lovell explained that
there was a need for more robust and widespread data in order for the issue to
be embraced.
"Although
it is a low cost intervention and can have some good outcomes, I do not think
the strength of evidence is there yet to justify it to the medical community,
which needs very strong evidence showing cost/benefits."
A
project by Manchester Metropolitan and Chester universities analysed citations
of published evidence on biodiversity and human health.
It
found that over the past 40 years, 173 articles had been published in 104
different journals.
"We
asked whose discipline is it," explained co-author Dr Konstantinos Tzoulas
from Manchester Metropolitan University.
"Is
it ecologists who are looking to go into the health sector, or is it the health
sector that is looking to go into ecology?
"That
is why we carried out this study," He told BBC News. "Who is
producing evidence and who is reading it?"
The
team found that the issue was being researched by at least 30 scientific
disciplines, including health, psychology, architecture, forestry and ecology.
As
a result, Dr Tzoulas observed, the results indicated that knowledge was
diffusing between the disciplines.
Dr
Lovell concluded: "There is definitely interest at the higher level and
going into policy. The evidence is there but not quite at a level to convince a
lot of clinically minded people."